With Charley and C'rizz: After The Divergent Universe.

"It's almost as if you're glad, glad that he's gone."
"You never really cared for him did you Doctor?"
"Oh it's because you liked it the way it used to be, before the Divergent universe...."

Audio Every now and then Doctor Who dangerously begins to review itself within the text and there it is again in Absolution, at the end, as Charley chides the Doctor for his attitude to the loss of C'rizz and it's almost as though she's addressing the fan reaction to that character and the turn of narrative events. At what's supposed to be an emotional moment and the catalyst for my favourite companion ever's departure from this eddy of the narrative flow, I caught myself answering, out loud, her rhetorical questions. Yep, yes, yes, yes I did. The whys and wherefores of my problems with with the Divergent universe were covered in (apparently) controversial detail last time, but just as in the novels the destruction of the Eighth Doctor's memory led to that range never quite gelling again (unless the author effectively ignored his amnesia) so even post-Divergent the continued inclusion of C'rizz with all of his psychological issues and unresolved tensions between the three of them mean that few of these adventures are as purely enjoyable as the range was pre-Divergent.

Series producer Gary Russell has subsequently revealed that two more series worth of Divergent stories were planned until the return of the series to television commercially necessitated the Eighth Doctor's return to Whoniverse proper which he lists as a season opener by Gary Hopkins (who would write Other Lives) instead, Scaredy Cat, Time Works and Something Inside.  The extent to which they were rewritten is more obvious in some than others though as I admittedly rather scathingly point out in my reaction paragraph below, Scaredy Cat potentially bore the brunt of this creative switcheroo.  The best scripts are those he doesn't mention developed somewhat in the more classical format though it's worth speculating on whether the other two would have improved the overall critical and audience consideration of that story arc and betray signs of the whole Divergent universe whateveritwasthingy gaining an upswing in momentum just as the novel series did just before that was cancelled.

Charley would have course go on to co-star in the Sixth Doctor range to brilliant effect (and to an extent have adventures better than some of these later Eighth Doctor examples) and have her own boxed set, which I haven't yet listened to so don't know if it finally resolves her rather maudlin impression of his fate.  It's unusual that they haven't been reunited outside of stories set in the narrative past.  Big Finish in general dislikes unfinished business even to the point of bringing back companions from the classic series and giving them the farewells they didn't properly receive on-screen (and very soon the Sixth Doctor).  Is it right that Charley should be left thinking that her best friend is dead even though he clearly isn't?*  But co-incidentally I'm writing this in the wake of today's news (I'm still trying to get the squee out of the carpet) and it's clear to an extent the Eighth Doctor range is about moving forward and that's exactly what I'm going to do too.

Terror Firma

One of the greatest Dalek story ever produced, certainly in the top five and clearly in the top ten Eighth Doctor stories across any media, Terror Firma does that rare thing in Who of capably and convincingly rewriting what we already knew without destroying what went before. Despite having been created to explain away Eighth's mention of Sam in Minuet in Hell during a moment when Big Finish was attempting to divorce itself from the novel and comic continuities (in the time before the release of A Company of Friends), we're nonetheless entirely convinced that he must have travelled with Samson and Gemma before Charley (aided on this narrative based listen through all the plays by their retrospective mention in the Mary Shelley stories) (and notice that Davros doesn't remove his memory of their adventures).  But Joseph Lidster's script offers rich characters and dialogue across the board and there's a sense of the series gettings its fifth or sixth wind.

Scaredy Cat

And every The Caves of Androzani has its The Twin Dilemma.  Scaredy Cat is a disaster.  Curiously and probably mercifully short (each cd is only about forty-odd minutes long), there's not one story beat which hasn't been done better elsewhere in the franchise and a stack of moments which fundamentally misunderstand the regular characters.  Oh look it's the scientific expedition from Kinda.  Oh its "we must not change history, not one word" from a dozen other places.  Say what you like about Charley Pollard but the moment when she picks up arms to defend the base from marauding wildlife is just wrong frankly.  McGann sounds out of sorts in his performance, C'rizz is at his most annoying and there's a general sense that something went horrendously wrong in the production, potentially related to the script having originally been prepared for the Divergent Universe arc.  Sections recorded before the change and then had to be patched over later?

Other Lives

Well look at you.  A barnstorming homage to the 60s historicals (mainly of the Spooner and Whittaker variety) married with the complex, multi-stranded narrative of a Dickens, Gary Hopkins's script also looks backwards to the pre-Divergent universe Eighth Doctor stories which always flipped neatly between humour and horror (rather than grimly stick to the latter).  The notion of having the regulars double up works well and there's a genuine sense with both them and the production of "We're back."  Still don't like Cr'zz though and it's a real shame his whole story arc is polluting the final days of what was the classic Who team-up of Eighth & Charley.  As a side note, some real world coincidences: I listened to this during the week when I was at Waterloo and Ron Moody died.  His fruity appearance as Wellington is one of the best that Big Finish have ever hosted (he's one of the few Oscar-nominated actors to appear in the franchise across its various media).

Time Works

Like clockwork (sorry) the Doctor overthrows a repressive regime just to show he's still entirely capable of it and this being a Steve Lyons script, he's entirely aware of his utility and almost carries out the process like a plumber attending to replace a stopcock.  The story would presumably have had even greater resonance with the Divergent universe arc in that it's about a society run on the tick-tock and that was a reality in which time apparently had no meaning.  A top draw cast which includes Adrian Schiller who'd later played Uncle in The Doctor's Wife and Ronald Pickup as the leader the Doctor has to negotiate with and their scenes are a clear highlight, a lot of the running around in the frozen time zones less so.  One of those stories which feels traditional but would be entirely impossible to create on television without an infinite budget and time - in other words the perfect Big Finish.

Something Inside

"... so strong, I know that I can make it, though you're doing me wrong so wrong..."  Another refugee from the Divergent universe arc (and showing it more than most), did Trevor Baxendale actually have Labi Siffre in mind whilst writing?  The song's lyrics could be grimly referencing the life of the "brain worm", the sneaky antagonist that eats its way through the cast to such an extent even the Doctor agrees he's not having the best of days.  A clever riff on films like Cube and The Thing, it's necessarily difficult to follow in places and would probably require a couple of listens.  But onward and upward.  Most notable element is the Doctor's motivation speech comes in the form of a talk through the 2005 European cup final, with name check for Steven Gerrard.  "I was at the match" he says, and you can hear the delight in the actor's voice as though he was even there himself (which he might well have been).

Memory Lane

Eddie Robson's one of my favourite audio writers and it's hard to credit that this superb entertainment was his first commission so expert is it in characterisation, pacing and exploration of its thoroughly good idea (an idea which would arguably be considered less successfully later in Amy's Choice).  It's all in the mastering of structure.  In the first episode, establish the intriguing premise of losing the TARDIS in the street with identical houses inhabited by an older man who acts like a ten year old and his mother, then in each subsequent episode introduce new characters and complications before winding up to a satisfying conclusion which logically develops from character.  So many superb moments and lines, notably the Charley grimly noticing that she only ever seems to meet a hallucination of her mother now.  Robson also scores some Tipping Point counters for reminding us that C'rizz absorbs the personalities around him explaining his sometimes inconsistent behaviour.

Absolution

Bye then C’rizz. As companion exits go this is pretty epic, but as Joe Ford notes on his blog, it's in an oddly structured way because he's absent for most of the second and third episode while writer Scott Alan Woodard goes about the business of reminding us why we liked the Eighth Doctor and Charley in the first place as he sets up the final few beats of the story (see above) and The Girl Who Never Was (though there are odd occasions when it's almost as though she's forgotten the events of Zagreus and the TARDIS it's almost as though the ship is entirely new to her, perhaps for the benefit of potential new listeners).  Plus it's one of those stories which introduces some potentially interesting stuff, like the TARDIS's chameleon circuit coming back online and introduction of a new console room but doesn't do much with them as a relatively uninvolving sub-Season 18 story with characters called things like Overseer Cacothis thrums along in the background.  Nice to hear my favourite Shakespeare play quoted though.  No, the other one.

The Girl Who Never Was

And by then Charley. As with Absolution, The Girl Who Never Was is slightly oddly structured for a final story (notionally) of a major companion in that (also notionally) it separates the Doctor and Charley for much of its duration which means we have to cherish their moments together, sparky and sometimes unpleasant as they are.  Just about as good as an Alan Barnes Eighth Doctor audio can be with perfectly chosen kisses to previous adventures in this range (even another Mary Shelley reference) and also still earlier and even a memory related moment which must surely have been an influence on Journey's End, another story with a painful companion exit.  Well reader, even knowing what's to come, I sobbed a little bit just as I did back when this was originally released then giggled and giggled thanks to a post-credits sequence which structurally pre-figures the MARVEL universe somewhat.  Part of me really wants to see what happens to Charley next (again) but ...

* except in a subsequent Sixth and Evelyn story, The 100 Days of the Doctor, he and she observe 8th, Charley and C'rizz attending a card game in the American Fronter with an older 8th & Lucie which should have the effect of indicating to Charley that he couldn't have died at the end of The Girl Who Never Was.  Unless the time differential shorted everything out or some such ala The Day of the Doctor and she doesn't remember.  Or some such.

Soup Safari #46: Tomato and Basil at Patisserie Valerie.







Lunch.  £5.10.  Patisserie Valerie, Unit 1 The Met Quarter, 34 Whitechapel, Liverpool, Merseyside L1 6DA. Phone: 0151 227 1678. Website.

"Too bad he didn’t get you into Sherlock as well."

TV Diana Rigg's been interviewed for Random Roles on The AV Club. Inevitably:
AVC: Having survived her encounter with Miss Piggy, your daughter Rachael Stirling is now an actress, and you worked together recently on Doctor Who.
DR: Yeah, that was fun. The guy, Mark Gatiss, who writes a lot of that show, and also he writes Sherlock—very, very clever man. I worked with him on All About My Mother, which was an adaptation of the Almodovar film which we did onstage at the Old Vic. He was playing a transsexual and I was playing a lesbian, and we got on really well. Then he played with Rachael in The Recruiting Officer, and then became friendly with Rachie, and suggested that he write something for she and I. Which was great fun.

AVC: Too bad he didn’t get you into Sherlock as well.

DR: Yeah. Well, the women’s parts in Sherlock aren’t that great, are they?
My initial thought was "Burrrrnnnn...." but I expect what she really means, as in Conan Doyle.  Hopefully.

My Favourite film of 1993.



Film Ah Groundhog Day.  Whenever I'm asked what my top five favourite films are (When Harry Met Sally, Ferris Bueller's Day Off, The Seventh Seal, In The Bleak Midwinter, Star Wars), there's always a guilty pang that the laws of mathematics can't be bent, in much the same way as physics and psychology in the narrative itself, so that Groundhog Day can be fitted in.  Why not this instead of Ferris Bueller?  I can't answer.  But those choices are just as much about personal history as simply listing some films I like, so I'm hoping by including it in this long list, I can go some way to atoning for the original sin.

Which isn't to say we don't have some history.  Groundhog Day was my end of school film.  On the night of the last day of school, when my colleagues all piled into the Coffee House on Church Road in Wavertree, Liverpool, not an actual coffee house but a pub and so not somewhere I frequented often if ever and notice the use of the word "colleagues" instead of friends, my Dad took me to the Odeon on London Road to see Groundhog Day instead.  Sat on the back row of an otherwise empty Screen Two, and this was before the refurbishment so Screen Two was still as cavernous as its numerically lower sibling and I was enraptured.

As you might have detected from previous entries, this has become something of a pattern.  Although it's true that other major life moments have been punctuated by parties, for the most, the pattern of this human's life is punctuated with films.  A few months later when I began university, although I attended a hall trip to the cinema for The Fugitive, I was the only one who returned a week later for Sleepless in Seattle.  The night of my nineteenth birthday was spent in the company of Speed.  All at The Lounge Cinema in Leeds.  When I graduated a few years later, I visited the Hyde Park Picture House that evening and sat on the balcony for a final time to watch John Sayles' Lone Star.

Having realised soon enough that New Year's Eve is a depressing bust, for a good long while now I've instead watched films set at New Year or with new year scenes at home instead: When Harry Met Sally, Kissing Jessica Stein, In Search of Midnight Kiss, Strange Days, Peter's Friends, The Hudsucker Proxy, Sleepless (again), The TV Movie (you know which one) but not New Year's Eve.  Not yet.  Luckily, this Wikipedia entry has some useful suggestions to help put off that nightmare.  In case you're wondering, I tend to watch It's A Wonderful Life every Christmas too, but don't we all, and don't we all weep as we realise what a depressing wallow it actually is.

As I get older it feels even more like the default option which makes me sound about as misanthropic as Phil Connors, the protagonist in Groundhog Day.  As a sidebar, imagine if the film had been set in the internet age, assuming Punxsutawney had decent broadband and wifi coverage.  If you were someone like me, you could never be bored.  Even after watching everything on Netflix and signing up to Amazon Prime and watching everything on there, there are all the other on-demand services.  Plus all the knowledge of the world at your finger tips.  Though film wise, watching Phil learn the piano from a YouTube tutorial would have been vastly less entertaining.

Part of me knows that I've missed something, am missing something.  Last year's film project reminds me that the last film I watched of my thirties was Pocahontas and on the evening of my fortieth I sat through the utterly rubbish but for one shot, Sinister.  This is not good and shows a certain degrading of the stakes.  At the very least, I could have gone to the cinema.  The Babadook was out that week.  If I was going to see a horror film, at the very least it could have been a good one.  Perhaps of all my behaviours this is the one which finally in need of changing.  I just hope it doesn't take being trapped somewhere unpleasantly pleasant to break the loop.

Soup Safari #45: Potato and Leek at The Fat Budgie.







Dinner. £4.50 (vegetable crisps included). The Fat Budgie, 60 Dale Street, Liverpool, Merseyside L2 5ST. Phone:0151 345 6749. Website.

Soup Safari #44: Sweet Potato and Sage at World Museum Coffee Shop.







Lunch. £3.50. World Museum Liverpool Coffee Shop, Ground Floor. William Brown St, Liverpool, Merseyside L3 8EN. Website.

Churchill's Secret.

TV Romola Garai's signed to appear in a drama about the final months of Winston Churchill's life along with a cast which sounds like it would otherwise be appearing in a BBC Stephen Poliakoff drama, with Charles Sturridge, a director who usually works on Channel 4 and it's being made for ITV.
Romola Garai, Matthew Macfadyen, Daisy Lewis, Rachael Stirling and Tara Fitzgerald have joined the cast of the small-screen movie Churchill's Secret, ITV announced.

Garai will play nurse Millie Appleyard and the others will play former Prime Minister Winston Churchill's adult children.

Based on Jonathan Smith's recently published book The Churchill Secret: KBO, the telepicture will be directed by Charles Sturridge. It stars Michael Gambon as the title character and Lindsay Duncan as his wife Clementine.
Nice as it is to see ITV branching out like this, it'll be interesting to see which timeslot it's given. 9pm on a Sunday will be my guess. I'll update this post when it's broadcast to see if I was right.

Elizabeth Wurtzel in The Telegraph.

Books An interview:
It’s funny, I tell her, to hear the one time emblem of disaffected youth sounding quite so, well, optimistic. “Of course marriage is optimistic,” she shrugs, “because it’s the beginning of something. And maybe getting married for the first time at 47 is my real mistake – maybe I should be on my third or fourth marriage. But really what I can’t believe is that people get married before they’re 47. My husband is 35 and I can’t understand why he’s giving up on being single at such a young age. Single people have more fun, after all. They’re out all the time at bars and museums – they’re doing so much because they’re looking for love.”

Soup Safari #43: Lentil at City Cafe.







Lunch. £2.50. City Cafe, 9 Stanley Street, Liverpool L1 6AA. Tel: 0151 255 0051. Website.

"Hey, that's my car!"

Film Watching The Bourne Supremacy this evening, I thought of this opening for a film and story idea. It's (c) Stuart Ian Burns if you want to license it.

Fifty-three seconds of logos.

Cut to interior of a car. I don't know anything about cars but let's say that it isn't wildly expensive and hasn't been replaced in a while, the sort of thing an emergency doctor might drive if they're just starting out and need to get to work quickly.

Michelle Monaghan is behind the wheel (I'm choosing her because she was curiously in The Bourne Supremacy in the group searching for the spy and she's brilliant in everything she's in) (plus Rachel McAdams is probably busy) and she's mid-conversation about racing the hospital because there's some kind of major incident happening and she's being called in on her day off.

She's all game face and professional.

Traffic is gridlocked and she's stuck at traffic lights. Abruptly there's a knock on the glass. Metallic tapping. She turns and on the reverse we see Mark Urban shouting through the passenger window (I'm choosing him because he was curiously in The Bourne Supremacy playing a Russian assassin and he's brilliant in everything he's in) (plus Cillian Murphy is probably busy) (um).

Panicking she takes her hands off the wheel and watches Urban run around the outside of the front of the vehicle pointing his gun at her.

"Out, out!" He shouts. In the background we can still hear the person Monaghan's been speaking to on the phone asking after her health.

"Okay, okay." She shouts back as she gets out and steps away. Urban jumps into the driver's seat and we then see he's somehow found a gap in the traffic and is speeding away leaving Michelle standing in the middle of the road in shock.

"Hey, that's my car!" She shouts as she begins idiotically to run after it only to realise her idiocy pretty quickly and slowing down, only to begin running again at full pelt as she spots her car turning the corner at the end of the road into moving traffic causing two others cars to collide with each other.

As she reaches the two cars which were involved in the collision, we can see that her own car is long gone and that carnage hasn't just been limited to these two vehicles. She immediately gets to work assessing what needs to be done.

This is a film about the people left behind in the aftermath of an action car chase.

Working title: "BYSTANDERS"

Perhaps as I get older, I'm noting this more and more, the cars and people and destruction left behind in car chases in action films, people who were simply going about their day, with a million things to do, who suddenly find their cars destroyed, even dealing with fatalities sometimes in horrors created by someone who's nominally supposed to be the hero or at least the protagonist.

It's the syndrome of characters being morally allowed to die within a fictional construct if we don't know them.

I wondered what a film would be like about them.  The original idea was for a comedy, a character loses their car in a similar circumstance to this and then spends the rest of the film trying to get it back, the final scene being the news that its been totalled and abandoned or even driven into a river.

But that's the obvious thing to do.

A drama's much more interesting.  Michelle Monaghan goes amateur sleuth and will spend the next two hours trying to find out all she can about the car chase and who the people involved were.  But it's brick wall and the whole thing is not a thriller.  It's about her obsession and the effect it has on her.

During the process she talks to the various people affected by the car chase but the reasons for it are entirely obscured although I like the idea of there being a montage sequence in which people whose cars were wrecked or witnessed some of it have all kinds of wild theories that are essentially like something from a Michael Bay film, Die Hard or the Bourne franchise.

But she never quite cracks it and gets on with her life.  Until something else happen major happens in her city and she goes to the place knowing instinctively that he'll be there.  The man who stole her car, the man who haunts her dreams.

Ooh, now that I've written that, I quite like the idea of her having various fantasies throughout the thing with her imagining what he's like.  But we never do know.

I know to an extent this is Doctor Who's Love & Monsters, but the scale is different and it doesn't have the inherent mythological baggage.

The final scene has her finally confront the man who stole her car.

The problem is without him being the cause of some personal pain for her, I can't think of an ending or a proper arc for her other than to find out if he is a villain or hero.  If he's a villain then we're into the ludicrous territory of her becoming an action hero herself and doing him in.  If he's a hero then she receives the equally awful lesson of "Well all these horrible things happened but they were for a good cause."

My best idea is for her to find him in a very public place like a railway station and for the follow exchange to occur.

MICHELLE:
You.  It is you.

URBAN:
Yes it's me.  Who?

MICHELLE:
No.  I just want answers.

URBAN:
Do I know you?

MICHELLE:
You stole my car.  You destroyed half the city.

URBAN:
Your car?

MICHELLE:
Yes.

Suddenly there's the sound of gunshots.  People run back and forth screaming.  Urban slams Michelle to the ground, but we just see her face as it hits the deck and his hand on her shoulder.  We realise that she's stumbled into the midst of his sequel.

URBAN:
Get down.

Michelle looks up at Urban who's checking into the rafters of the station for the shooter.

MICHELLE:
Why?

URBAN:
What?

MICHELLE:
I just want to know why?

Cut to black.

Soup Safari #42: Leek and Mushroom at the Signature Cafe.







Lunch. £3.25.  Signature Cafe, Rapid Discount Outlet, George Henry Lee Building, Clayton Square, Liverpool, Merseyside L1 1AD. Telephone: 0151 708 2000. Website.

Andrew Marr's Not Shakespeare.



Theatre Broadcast last night and currently on the iPlayer for at least a month, The Culture Show and Arts Review replacement Artsnight investigated some renaissance writers who aren't Shakespeare.

Whilst the previous four editions have been a bit of a mishmash, editor and presenter Andrew Marr both defenestrates and adheres to the format (interviews mixed with reports) turning it into what amounts to a mini-presenter led piece about John Ford, Marlowe and Webster with an emphasis on contemporary politics and the position of women in their plays.

Local interest comes from, as you can see from the above illustrative photograph, an appearance by Catrin Stewart, Jenny Paternoster from Doctor Who who is starring in Ford's Love's Sacrifice at the RSC (though note that there's a whopping great spoiler, and yes I do still think that's a thing even with a four hundred year old play if it's relatively obscure).

In an ideal world, in other words any time before the last license fee settlement, the BBC would have commissioned a six or ten part series looking at a bunch of these writers as well as a whole season of new production and repeats.

But then we're still waiting for a proper history of the theatre aren't we?

Soup Safari #41: Tomato and Red Pepper at Poundbakery.







Snack. £1.00. Poundbakery, 47 Lord Street, Liverpool, Merseyside, L2 6PB. T:0151 227 3669. Website.

The Vinyl Experience Without The Vinyl.



Music Passing through Urban Outfitters today in a moment of midlife crisis / 90s nostalgia for alt.culture, I stumbled up on the vinyl wall and was astonished to see Taylor Swift's 1989 is indeed available on black shiny disc.

 While you're all laughing at me for my obliviousness to the idea that vinyl's now back in fashion enough that this item is apparently worth manufacturing, I wondered how one might recreate the experience of listening to vinyl, at least the ritual of it if not the earthy sound, without a record player (especially since, for various reasons, I don't have access to mine right now).

The above video features someone carefully unpacking their vinyl copy of the best pop album of last year, which with some pausing, offers the following extremely useful information of the track to side or side to track breakdown:

Disc 1

SIDE A

1 Welcome To New York
2 Blank Space
3 Style

SIDE B

4 Out of the Woods
5 All You Had to Do Was Stay
6 Shake It Off


Disc 2

SIDE A

7 I Wish You Would
8 Bad Blood
9 Wildest Dreams

SIDE B

10 How You Get The Girl
11 This Love
12 I Know Places
13 Clean

Notice that it doesn't have the bonus tracks (all of which are as good as the rest of the CD) from the special edition. It's 1989 in its purest form (for better or worse).

Next choose your music listening device of choice. Being entirely pig headed I have the mp3s in the local folder on Spotify. Next, create four new playlists and call them:



Then add in the tracks for each side as per the above breakdown and we're done.

What this means is that like a vinyl listener, after ten minutes of music the listener has to actively go to the next playlist and press play, with all the sense of anticipation involved.  You should sit across the room from your generic potentially fruit based mp3 device for maximum emulation.  Perhaps give the screen a dust if you need some extra processing time.

The structure of the album changes because "Out of the Woods", "I Wish You Would" and "How You Get The Girl" become the opening tracks in a new set of entities rather than a continuation of the track before which changes the colour and texture of the piece somewhat.  Similarly tracks which wouldn't other have extra portent now gain such from being at the end of a "side".

That's what was lost, I suppose in the CD rush and subsequently with streaming and download options.  The first side of Paul Simon's Graceland ended with Diamonds on the Souls of her shoes with You Can Call Me Al the introduction to the other side.  On the CD, something is certainly lost in that regard and without burning two separate discs, the vinyl (or cassette) experience of having the forced gap in between an original part of the aural design of the record is lost, whole creative discussions about which track to put first on the second side voided.

With 1989, in order to accommodate the whole cd/downloadable entity, albeit the shorter version, the producers of the vinyl have had to put it over the four sides and no doubt in order to balance them across (even though you could certainly fit all the tracks on about one and a half discs), and adopted a 3-3-3-4 formation.  So now we have arguably something happening in the opposite direction, a musical entity designed to be listened to in a single sitting, now forcibly broken up by the older format.

Who made the decision on this?  Taylor herself?  Was the track order chosen with all formats in mind?  As far as I can see 1989 wasn't released on cassette so at least that didn't need to be dealt with though oddly the above listing would have worked extremely well, side one ending with "Shake It Off" with side two opening on "I Wish You Would" (a format which again could easily be emulated using the above process with less playlists).

Either way this is a way of returning some minutiae of the analogue experience digitally.  Possibly.

Soup Safari #40: Beef Goulash at Cinnamon Cafe Bar and Lounge.







Lunch. £2.20. Cinnamon Cafe Bar and Lounge, City Exchange, 39 Old Hall Street, Liverpool, Merseyside L3 9PP. Telephone: 0151 236 5222. Website.

My Favourite Film of 1994.



Film The following was posted on my Hamlet blog just over ten years ago. I'll add that I remember seeing it vividly at screen one of the Odeon on London Road on a night when I was home from university with my family. You can bet I gave my Dad a big hug afterwards.

On release, The Lion King was widely broached as being a departure for Disney -- it was their first major animated film not based on a particular source material, be it a fairy tale or piece of literature. Which in watching is only half-true. Whilst it doesn't directly re-tell a particular story, it does draw on a number of elements, including Disney's own Bambi and particularly visibly, Hamlet. Except with Lions.

Almost. The story is superficially similar -- a king murdered by his brother who steals the throne but is eventually revenged by the late king's son. But the action of the play is shaken up, the elements moved about for the purposes of expressing different themes and creating an ending which while not completely happy, is certainly more positive than the mass slaughter which occurs at the end of Shakespeare. For example, the late king, Mufasa does appear as a ghost to the young Hamlet figure, Simba -- but rather than explain how he died (something his son will have to learn later for dramatic purposes) he nudges Simba into following his destiny of taking over the crown.

The film is more concerned with telling a good story than directly referencing its sources. There is a moment when the Claudius figure, Scar holds up a skull, but it doesn't seem like a conscious homage. Similarly there aren't any noticable times when the dialogue parallels anything from the play, except perhaps 'To be or not...' (when Simba finds his life catching up with him in the plains) but that's more to do with these being universal themes rather than anything specific. Also Timon and Pumba, the Rosencrantz and Guildenstern have a much great slice of the action, especially in the closing moments. We effectively see in the film what might have happened if Hamlet had gone to Wittenberg instead of hanging around the palace plotting revenge. Another what if built on here is the appearance of the Hyenas on the prideland which certainly smells of a successful invasion of Fortinbras while Claudius is in power.

The Lion King is a favourite film and I wouldn't want it to change -- the balance between tragedy and comedy is just perfect, as are songs, which are probably some of the best Elton John has written. In the interviews and commentary for the film on the dvd, you can tell there is a slight disappointment that the creators of the work couldn't nudge it closer to the Shakespeare. Certainly the original concept art was much bolder and starker. Was there a moment during the development when the script was much closer to Hamlet the play and how different would that version have been? Less songs presumably and Nala drowing in the watering hole. Which would be wrong, frankly. Still at least we can introduce the play to kids by saying ... "It's a bit like The Lion King only sadder..."

Soup Safari #39: Tomato and Basil at Lime St Bistro.







Lunch. £4.25. Lime St Bistro, Liverpool Empire, Lime Street, Liverpool, L1 1JE. Phone: 0151 702 7354. Website.

Soup Safari #38: Vegetable at the Trattoria 51 Pizzeria.







Dinner. £3.95. Trattoria 51 Pizzeria, 25-31 Old Hall Street, Liverpool, Merseyside L3 9SY. Phone: 0151 236 4739. Website.

Soup Safari #37: Cream of Pumpkin at Filini Bar & Restaurant.







Dinner. £5.50. Filini Bar & Restaurant, Radisson Blu Hotel, 107 Old Hall Street, Liverpool, L3 9BD. Tel: 0151 966 1500. Website.

Heritage TV.

TV TFI Friday's revival was a mess and descended in its final half hour into a Chris Evans Top Gear campaign broadcast. Sad. Stuart Heritage's live blog at The Guardian sums things up:
"What an odd show this has turned out to be. It’s less a celebration of what TFI Friday was, and more an abject apology. Chris Evans looks mortified by everything he used to do on the show, and the whole thing is suffused with an overwhelming politeness. All the anarchy has gone. It’s sad, like the final scene of One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest."
The only time this blog mentioned TFI was back in its primordial stage in relation to Anna Nolan from the first Big Brother appearing on it in an update to a long article analysing the cultural tastes of the housemates. I've been at this for a very, very long time.