Art Excellent news. This blog post was picked up by Radio Merseyside who reported on it this afternoon. They've spoken to the council and ...
It's looking a little mutton but now @lpoolcouncil has agreed to repaint the city's #Superlambanana pic.twitter.com/Y00Kt6WZ8U— BBC Radio Merseyside (@bbcmerseyside) July 7, 2016
We are told its replacement will find a permanent home on the Strand by 2018 #superlambanana https://t.co/BI3VqF0lPh— Claire Hamilton (@chamiltonbbc) July 7, 2016
Here's the original post ...
Art Some friends visited Liverpool today and I gave them a tour of the city taking in the major sites one of which being the Superlambanana which is currently outside one of John Moores University's libraries on Tithebarn Street. As I discovered back in the late nineties when researching public art for various reasons, although towns and cities are very grateful to have them installed, their upkeep is a whole other thing and so it's proving with what's become a modern icon of the city.
As you can see from the above photo and the close-ups below, the paintwork is pretty much knackered, less cared for than the average bus shelter. At a certain point it has had a second layer but rather than doing what's needed which is to sand the whole thing down and start again with a more weather resistant paint, it was simply touched up between the gaps and now in large sections the paintwork has dropped away leave bare concrete. It looks sad. Unloved. Forgotten.
This shot is of a major portion of the side. As you can see the paint has almost completely fallen away.
You may have noticed in the midst of that the addition of the litter bin which has been put next to the underbelly of the beast. Here it is in-situ. I've blanked out the face of the members of the public nearby. Apologies for the language by the way but I was trying to get the getting one people who this on social media. Some intemperate bad language seems to work. For some reason.
Who administers the upkeep of the sculpture I wonder? Is there a special budget somewhere? Does original artist Taro Chiezo need to be involved? It's just extremely weird that a piece of public art which is merchandised this extensively, which has spawned all of those children, notably those produced in 2010 which are now outside the Museum of Liverpool and clearly loved by some many people should now be in such a shabby state.
No comments:
Post a Comment