Showing posts with label radio reviews. Show all posts
Showing posts with label radio reviews. Show all posts

a very public sandwich

Radio This lunchtime I ate a very public sandwich.

The Manchester International Festival began last night and to celebrate, a special episode of Radio 4’s Front Row programme was recorded at the radio theatre on Oxford Road. In the email ticketing solicitation, it was explained that Victoria Wood, Paul Heaton and other guests 'to be announced' to would be appearing and since said Manchester International Festival also includes the live Doctor Who performance piece The Crash of the Elysium I decided it was worth a punt to see if one of the guests 'to be announced' would be someone related to that.

Doors were due to open at half twelve and I decided to do some shopping beforehand, the usual haunts, HMV (for this week's sale), Vinyl Exchange, Fopp (not in that order) and Marks & Spencers in my on-going search for the perfect jumper. Lately I’ve been watching The Killing and so at present my perfect jumper is influenced by that Danish crime drama which is admittedly probably a bit too chunky-knit for this time of year.  Everything was carefully timed out, how long each shop would take, how far the distance between each.  Manchester is probably my second city now and not Paris as I'd previously planned.

As a side note, in the post-Lovefilm, post-Spotify era, visiting the music shops is a depressing business, especially that HMV where the specialist music section has been evicted from the basement in favour of games and a console playing zone (a kind of modern amusement arcade with passwords instead of a change machine), and finds itself stuck at the back of the ground floor, classical, jazz and world all crammed uncomfortably in together. Vinyl Exchange too has lost some of its thoroughgoing nature. With less cds being sold because of downloads, there are less cds also being sold on, so once full racks are now half empty, especially in the soundtrack section.

The non-usual haunt and my timing downfall was That’s Entertainment, a branch of which has opened opposite the HMV. Apparently opened by the previous owner of Music Zone and stocked, according to the counter clerk, with the cds and dvds which have sat in their warehouse for seven years, this offers a history of the mainstream for one, two or four pounds. In the post-Lovefilm, post-Spotify era this still somehow seems expensive, plus with my collection, it’s difficult to even find something I’d want. I’m always second guessing myself. Do I really need a blu-ray of The Fugitive?

After what seemed like an hour, though probably more like forty-minutes I walked out having paid first with dvds of WarGames knock-off Eagle Eye (Rosario Dawson) and Pans Labyrinth and the second soundtrack album for Moulin Rouge (the one with songs actually taken from the soundtrack as opposed the remixes which turned up on the first).  I was now running late, time management in tatters. After glancing through Marks and Spencer and not finding the jumper I was looking for (no chunk-knit) I decended into the basement and bought the sandwich, Wensleydale cheese and carrot pickle, once I'd convinced myself the scary red traffic lights on the packaging had to be an over exaggeration.

Then I was walking. Walking as fast as my thirty-six year old, decrepit before their time legs could carry me.  Up Deansgate past the burrito shop that for the first time in ages doesn't have an employee outside giving away free samples, across Albert Square (well more like round Albert Square since this has become Festival Square and is filled with giant wooden structures) and up Oxford Road (or street – the signs are contradictory) until I reached BBC Manchester and see dozens and dozens of people piling in. I’d obviously underestimated Victoria Wood’s pulling power and had been running later than I'd previously supposed.

On entering the foyer, us audience members were each given a number. I was 177. By the time I reached the auditorium it was mostly full. After a brief conversation about the extent to which someone could be sitting in an empty chair, I noticed a block of about twenty free seats at the front, just off to the side, a few yards away from the broadcasting tables, fanned out with blue table cloths and large microphones.  I sat there or rather I sat there after conscientiously checking with a guide that I could sit there.  I’d be watching the programme with some of the faces of the guests in profile but it was still a better view than for some.

I had hoped that the rest of the block would fill up, but it wasn’t to be. As people arrived they preferred to take up residence right at the back and so I was a bit stuck out.  Like a lemon. This is not the kind of thing which usually bothers me. If I’m alone, I always sit near the front of the cinema, front row too for lectures, so why not the front row for Front Row? At which point I realised I hadn’t had time to eat my sandwich and my tummy was rumbling and a rumbling tummy was probably not what the Radio 4 audience would want to hear after having just eaten dinner themselves this evening.

After a bit, a producer walked up to the microphone at the front and told us we had time to go to the toilet of we needed to, which of course means everyone wanted to go to the toilet, including me. I won't give you those details but on my way back I asked the producer if this was a no-food zone and he said, no it was quite alright, so long as I wasn’t eating during the programme. So I sat and pulled my sandwich out and slowly began masticating whilst reading a magazine, Doctor Who Magazine with its poignant Nicholas Courtney tributes.

A minute or two later, the same producer approached a microphone at the front and began the process of warming up the audience. He asked if anyone had come far. Someone shouted York which did seem far until someone else mentioned Gloucester and just to see Victoria Wood. Fans, eh? All the while I’m working my way through the first half of the sandwich, trying to finish it before the programme started, probably barely tasting the cheese and chutney and barely paying attention to what was going on around me.

All the while the producer was talking. I think I heard him ask us to turn off our mobile phones (already done). That we should relax (I was). That someone had even brought their lunch at which point I became very aware of the sandwich I was holding which was just a few centimetre away from an open mouth filled with saliva and I was especially aware of the three hundred odd pairs of eyes now all looking in my general direction, the producers body turned in my direction.  This seemed like a good moment to blow everything out of all proportion.

People giggled. “I’m hungry” I think I muttered, but not really knowing how to react. It wasn’t until he mentioned it that I properly realised that because I was sat so close to the front opposite the rest of the audience, everything I’d done could potentially have been watched by people looking for someone to watch in an otherwise quite boring room and as I continued chewing, out of the corner of my eye I could still see people looking over. A girl on the front row kept grinning at me. This was the most public sandwich I'd ever eaten.  I felt like a performance art piece. “Man eating sandwich.”

Happily by the time I’d finished ingestion, the crowd had been distracted away by the appearance of presenter Mark Lawson. Regular readers will know this is the second occasion on which I’ve been in the same room as the man, having found myself discussing a work at FACT Liverpool with him and his colleague on the opening day of last year’s Liverpool Biennial.  It hadn’t occurred to me he’d be at this despite being the show's primary presenter and happily he didn’t have time to recognise me or congratulate me on my clever observations (!) of the Tehching Hsieh piece.  Perhaps I'm doomed to just keep inadvertantly meeting Lawson at arts festivals, rather than interview me about having done something useful.

He introduced himself and explained who the guests would be. Victoria Wood talking about her new play, Paul Heaton chatting about his new song cycle, playwright Charlotte Keatley reviewing the Bjork concert that opened the festival and poet Lavinia Greenlaw on her audio artwork which allows visitors to Manchester Picadilly station, via headphones, to eavesdrop on the imagined thoughts of their fellow passengers.  No one from Doctor Who then, but there was no denying, when they were ushered out, Wood’s star quality and the excitement of being in the same room as Heaton whose music I listened to growing up (and indeed saw on sale earlier in That’s Entertainment for a pound per cd).

Then Mark surprised us all by asking the audience to sing the theme tune to The Archers (Barwick Green). It was, he said, because having presented almost a couple of thousand editions of Front Row live (he gave us an exact number but I didn’t have a pen), he needed that music to get him in the mood. And we duly acceded with a mass sing-song, that was accurate enough to even included the uncomfortable climax when Arthur Wood’s composition fades out halfway through the next verse.

Then we were off and the results can be heard on the BBC website. The short version is that whilst Wood has written a musical number set in a Berni Inn, both Heaton and Keatley admitted to having had their first job in said defunct restaurant chain.  It was an unexpected reminder of when I was a child visiting the Berni Inn near the Pier Head, their steaks a real treat at a time when our family was relatively poor.  Someone's uploaded a photograph to flickr although it's from well past its heyday.  It seemed more luxurious when we visited, taking a window seat so that we could look out across the Mersey at night.

Lawson’s timing was impeccable. Having presented all of those episodes live he’s clearly very adept at knowing how to pace the content, giving each of the guests equal measure.  I couldn’t see a clock anywhere so I have to assume he instinctively knew when half an hour had gone by. He didn’t even take advantage of the recorded nature of the programme and let it go on longer. Front Row is half an hour of arts programming and that’s what we got. 

Between the news and The Archers each night on Radio 4 is a trailer for the upcoming Front Row.  This is read in live most nights, but it was to be recorded as well, with all of the strangeness of talking in the future tense about a programme we'd just heard.  Lawson joked that perhaps we should now improvise the news too until one of guests noted the bulletin would probably end with an Andy Murray update at which point some of us shouted “Go, Andy”. I was apparently the loudest because Lawson, Victoria Wood and the rest of the guests looked over and suddenly I had the attention of everyone again.

It was time to go.  Most of us made for the exit, but a fair few people made forVictoria Wood and autographs.  But I still had business.  As you can see, one of the guests was artist Lavinia Greenlaw who has an audio installation piece at Manchester Picadilly station in which the thoughts of fellow passengers are hinted at through headphones. Deciding that I had to at least enjoy something of the festival, I headed back up to Oxford Road station and bought a one-way ticket across town.

On arriving back where I started from, I set about finding the booth on the main concourse that Mark Lawson mentioned.  I found the booth. Then I found the dates printed on the booth:



"2 - 17th July".

Time had finally gotten the better of me.  Since the Front Row had been a recording, and it would be broadcast this evening, Audio Obscura would be open the day after listeners had heard about it.  I had become caught in the limbo between the two. I was tempted to recreate the experience on the way home, deliberately eavesdropping on other passengers in a similar way to Greenlaw's audio recordings (though obviously without the telepathic aspect), but decided that I'd already been in enough trouble that afternoon.

Oh well. Perhaps there’ll be a podcast.

hawk-like glare

Politics When BBC Radio 4's Today programme took the, as presenter John Humphries says, "unusual step" of promising an MP anonymity if he would write about the atmosphere in Westminster and then hide their identity by having their words spoken by an actor, I wonder if they (the MP or Today) were expecting this performance.

Extraordinary, isn't it. Usually when such things are read out, the actor drops into their audiobook voice, not quite monotone, but certainly with a degree of neutrality. Here, whoever the actor is (he sounds a bit like the late Alistair Cooke) gives it a level of emotional intensity that borders on the ludicrous, as though he's appearing at the National, Olivier Award on standby.

If this wasn't on a news programme I would have been impressed; he is very effective. As he says "I'm not corrupt. I didn't come into this for the money", the expression is so convincing you can almost see him, an old political warhorse, sitting in his office at Westminster, revolver resting on a typed suicide note, glass of ancient whiskey in his left hand confessing his sins to Harry Pearce from Spooks, who's hawk-like glare is almost willing his right hand towards the gun.

But this was on a news programme and eventually I corpsed at the sheer ludicrousness of what I was hearing, and was still laughing when the actor reached what he (and the MP) hoped was the apotheosis ("That's what makes it such a nightmare, and a nightmare that may never end.") and Humphries breathed in audibly before introducing his guests.

Update... Just watched the extended version of Have I Got News For You (because what's the point of the Friday version?) and noticed that Paul Merton, I think, make a comment about someone with a bottle of whiskey in one hand and gun in the other in relation to the expenses scandal. "Great" minds, etc.

Review 2008: The BBC



Suggested by Franchesca.

Dear BBC,

I bloody love you.

A popular television website was looking for contributions to a review of the television year. After thinking about the five programmes I most enjoyed, I wrote some paragraphs and only at the very end did I realise that they'd all been broadcast on BBC channels, which is amazing considering I don’t watch very much television these days having long abandoned just simply sitting in front of anything in favour of dvds and PVRs and the right to choose. I only ever listen to BBC radio, mostly Radio 4, sometimes Radio 3, lately a bit of Radio 2. You keep me informed and interested in the world, a place you continue to be fascinated with, leaving me never less than entertained and surprised.

Then there is Sachsgate.

I know like everything I’ve loved, there’s some disappointment along the way, niggles, really, and I’m not going appreciate everything you do. I wish you’d return BBC Breakfast to its clever mid-90s heydays instead of trying to be a posh GMtv. I wish you’d decide what BBC Two is supposed to be doing – it shouldn’t just be the place for programmes that wouldn’t appear on BBC One as well as programmes that have or will. I wish you’d properly fund BBC Three so that it doesn’t have to fill most of its schedule with reruns and films. I wish you wouldn’t keep cutting BBC Four’s budget so that it can make more of the intelligent drama which has always been its hallmark.

I’ll leave my opinions about the answer phone messages to one side because I didn’t hear them broadcast in context and I can’t really be too po-faced about them since I still laugh like a drain at the Victor Lewis Smith prank calls from TV Offal, especially when he called Derek Nimmo in the middle of the night to tell him the Queen Mother had died (she hadn't yet).

What disappointed me about the affair was your reaction.

When the broadcast originally went out, there were a handful of complaints which is not too surprising. But it was still a non-story then, mostly because if someone trips over on the pavement in Eastenders, a view probably throws an invective at you for suggesting that Walford Council’s highways management department aren’t doing their job properly.

As this attached timeline from The Guardian describes, the story only gained traction when the Daily Mail became involved over a week after the original broadcast in a desperate attempt to fill one of their pages with words and probably a photo of Russell Brand looking unkempt. They contacted Andrew Sach’s agent; Sach’s initially had no comment and only when the Mail said they’d run the story anyway did you get a complaint. Story’s published, back filled with this complaint, and the rest is history.

There were a range of problems with the way the BBC handled the story, both internally and in relation to PR, though I’m sure there’s a lot that went on behind the scenes between people that isn’t even in the resulting report, and though some of that material portrayed those involved as being indicative of an uncaring broadcaster was only more or less packed with examples of the kind of knuckle-headed mental meandering which happens in the average office, and probably at the Daily Mail itself.

Media types tend to be cynical. They have to be.

What annoyed me was at no point did anyone at the BBC go on the attack and point out what this was really about – commercial organisations wounding the one rival who isn’t governed by commercial concerns at a time when newspaper circulations are falling and advertising revenues have dropped. The Daily Mail have been running stories like this for ages; Associated Newspapers seem to have a campaign against the corporation, using every opportunity to berate everything you do. Only today there’s a story …

It’s just that on this occasion they struck lucky and were able capture the lack of imagination in the audience who called seemingly on mass even though they hadn’t heard the original broadcast and probably only had the fragments of transcript published in the paper. It certainly didn’t help that BBC News were running the story too at some point and as a top story, even though the rest of the world was falling apart. I appreciate that this was so that you couldn’t be criticised for having a cover up or restriction of the news departments independence, but it seemed like an act of self harm which stretched on for days.

I can't say what effect all of this will have on the short term future of the corporation but in the long term, assuming this kind of thing keeps happening, it can only lead to what these media rivals want -- a weakening of the BBC so that is looks toothlessly faded and out of step with the consumer in comparison to its commercial rivals. I'll probably still love you, but wish you were taking far more risks.

Take care of yourself,

Stu.x

[Why am I doing this?]

"Hello and welcome to Any Answers?" -- Jonathan Dimbleby, 'Any Answers?'

Radio Tonight, I attended a recording of BBC Radio 4’s discussion programme Any Questions? at the Everyman Theatre, introduced by Jonathan Dimbleby. For as long as I can remember I’ve listened to the Saturday lunchtime repeat of the programme, invariably shouting at the radio when one of the particularly small minded guests says something idiotic. I was passing by the Playhouse the other week, saw a poster advertising the visit and knew, if only for curiosity sake, that I had to go along.

The programme has always had a slightly scary ability to crop up in an area in which a major news story is happening and so the Radio Four listener tonight might infer that the programme was coming from Liverpool simply because of the tragedy that has been unfolding of the past couple of days. But I booked my ticket a week ago and it was advertised as coming from here in the Radio Times. It was simply one of those odd, scary, bizarre co-incidences.

I decided to wait until today before formulating the inevitable question. I wanted to get on the air so I made a point of trying to write something in the style of the questions that tend to be asked on air. I’m the last person who’d want to talk about what happened in Croxteth, so stuck to what I know and cribbing from the front page of today’s The Guardian wrote on the suggestion card: “Does the panel agree with Newsnight presenter Jeremy Paxman’s sentiment that the television industry is suffering from a ‘catastrophic loss of nerves?” Imagining a wry smile from Paxo when he heard it back tomorrow.

I arrived very early as usual and was ushered into the bar. A wooden box on a table with a bright Radio 4 logo on it was in place to take question cards. People were approached to put their questions to this oracle, slotting them in with some reverence. Apart from a woman who turned up with her question printed out five times because I think she thought it meant it would stand more of a chance of being used as though this was some kind of vote. There seemed to be a move for people to ask more than one question so I also dropped in something about the media holding up a mirror to society and about the climate protestors, but I didn’t really think either were good enough.

The Everyman is a surprising venue for the kind of programme. I always imagine Any Questions? happening in the same kinds of venues as its tv cousin Question Time, all grand halls and universities and whatnot. That must have given this a more intimate atmosphere than most programmes in the series -- and now and then the panellists seemed quite surprised to be able to see out disapproval or not up close as we eyeballed them or not. For those who don’t know, this is a theatre in the round and the panellists would be sat on table in the centre back of the ‘stage’ or more descriptively floor, at table covered in Radio 4 blue table closes with logos all about the place.

I was the first in the room and deposited myself on the second row -- behind the seats reserved for questioners. I was followed initially by what many Radio 4 comedy shows joke as being a typical Radio 4 discussion show type of audience, mostly pensioners and retirees who look like they’re on a coach trip. I felt a bit isolated as they gathered in the seats about me but as time went on the demographic balanced out and almost as though the BBC had selected them, I think there where people from every walk of society in there. I’d like to say there was a nervous energy in the room, some pent up anger perhaps because of what had been happening in the city, but there really wasn’t at least not in my section.

The man who sat next to me even turned and said:
‘Can you see the flashback?’
I looked about and wondered if suddenly that my own reality was indeed a facade and that any minute there would cross mix to me being born or my first kiss. It didn’t happen, so I counter asked:
‘What do you mean?’
‘The light’s reflecting.’ A spotlight was reflecting off of one of the name badges on the panellist’s table. ‘Put your head where I’m sitting.’
Not really seeing how I could do that since he was already there I grinned and said instead:
‘Don’t worry. This is radio. You won’t be able to see it.’
He nodded, taking that as a perfectly decent explanation (?) and began talking to his wife.

Above our heads, theatre speakers piped out the greatest hits of the station's theme tunes, including The Archers which in its extended mega mix lasts forever and has the usual tricked out solos these things always have because the composer has had to make up another five minutes worth of music around the stuff that people recognised. It’s surprising actually how many work shorn of their function and simply as musical pieces -- I wondered briefly if there was a best of album and then wondered what that meant I was turning into.

Eventually, the warm up lady, Alex, from BBC local radio appeared. She talked about working for the Radio Merseyside and talked about how friendly Liverpool made her feel, about how it was like coming home and how the rivalry between Liverpool and Manchester mirrors that between Sunderland and Newcastle. She then listed a couple of things that might be said to try and get us in the mood for applauding and booing, asking us what we thought of Boris Johnson etc, underlined that the panelists aren’t warned what the questions are and then randomly threw the floor open for questions about BBC Radio.

Enter the rentagob. The rentagob would appear again during the radio broadcast but this time he had Alex in his sights. ‘What I’d like to know is why you people always want to suggest that us scousers are always doin down Mancs’ Tough crowd, I thought. ‘I was joking…’ Alex said, ‘You all knew I was joking didn’t you, who thought I was joking.’ Claps, cheers, show of hands. Then I said that it was lovely to see them here and where there any plans for the comedy shows to make an appearance? She said that they’d been invited to the Everyman and suggested we write to the particular shows themselves. Then, brilliantly Gemma Bodinetz, artistic director of the Everyman said that she had invited them, but they only ever want to come during the theatre season. Question answered, job done.

Then executive producer Peter Griffiths strode onto the floor for the pick-me moment. His researcher had the pile of questions. He began reading and to but to the chase my name came up third. How exciting. I put my hand up and walked to the front and sat in my designated chair as the researcher handed my a script copy of my question with my name at the top and my words underneath. Except ‘Does’ had become ‘Doe’ which made no sense which is why I was sure I’d read it out that way on the radio. I stepped onto the floor and walked up to the researcher who was still directing people to sit down.

‘Can I borrow your pen?’
‘You’re fine sitting there.’
‘No.’ I showed her the sheet. ‘I need to change this. I know I’d say ‘Doe’ otherwise.’
After actually saying ‘Ulp’ as though it’s a real world, pen was lent, correction was made.

Finally the panel were brought out and introduced in much the same way as you’ve seen happen before US sitcoms, perhaps without the bows and self-aggrandising. I’d read the names beforehand but now I could put names to faces. They were, reducing their biography (available beforehand) with my own prejudices intact: Peter Oborne, a columnist for the Daily Mail who I actually recognised; Paul Vallely, the associate editor for The Independent who I didn’t; Louise Bagshawe, the novelist and Tory; and Ian McMillan the poet and Radio 4 presenter who I also recognised and quite like. Then close behind, Jonathan Dimbleby who as with all people who meet off the television or radio is shorter than you imagine.

After Dimbleby thanked us for being there and said a few words about what our behaviour should be whilst on the radio (largely ignored during the programme) and asked for the rehearsal question to check sound levels. It was about the cancelling of Celebrity Big Brother and even though some of the panel were under the impression that the whole programme had been cancelled, they generally thought its loss was a jolly good thing although Oborne was already in controversial mode suggesting that the racism incident was simply the media holding up a mirror to society (ahem).

Rather than simply beginning as the show went to air, the eight o’clock news was piped into the auditorium. That’s when the atmosphere changed, as we listened collectively to the latest news about the teenager being arrested in relation to the murder. I wondered if this had been what it was like before television when people had to gather in cinemas to watch news reels, dispatches from wars, collectively experiencing the ills of the world. Sure enough, the deaths in Afghanistan were mentioned. Then, lights up and the show began.

You can listen to it here online for the next week after tomorrow's repeat on Radio 4 at 1:10pm. As you’ll hear, Dimbelby was the consummate broadcaster capturing the mood of the coincidence of the show being in Liverpool at this moment. Obviously the first few questions were about the incident and I would say the whole first half was dedicated to them. I agreed with everything the panellists said -- it was difficult not to except for Oborne who turned into a stereotypical conservative, knocking on at length about the erosion of family values and father figures and fulfilling all of the expectations this leftist had of him.

The producer held up three fingers and the researcher sat next to me, microphone in hand. I tried to take it off her because I thought she was passing it to me, but she pulled it away.
‘Gentleman in the front row.’
And you can hear the results. I wasn’t nervous. I didn’t flub and took it slowly. I’ve done voiceover work before don’t you know (email me and I’ll tell you the details) and it’s all to do with stress patterns, I think. Only afterwards did I realise that wasn’t Paxman’s juiciest quote (the wry smile I was imaging now becoming a role of the eyes) and indeed the panellists didn’t really answer the question instead leading off into a ramble about the ills of television and whatnot, with Oborne once again saying some very silly things and because he went on I didn’t get to offer my follow up comment (running out of time) which would have been:

“Well I think actually there’s a catastrophic loss of trust in viewers; for some reason programme makers think they have to sensationalise subjects or hide mistakes as though viewers will lose faith in the magic of tv if they find out the truth when something goes wrong or isn’t quite as exciting as programme makers wish they were. I’m much more interested in what goes wrong sometimes…”

Or something like that. It would have been a winner anyway.

As the programme progresses you do enter a kind of trance as you begin to balance what the panellists are saying against your own opinions on a given subject. No, in relation to slavery, people who haven’t done something shouldn’t apologise for it so I’m clapping McMillan, Vallely and unbelievably Bagshawe (who looked like she’d walked off the set of Party Animals) but booing Oborne. That actually tended to be the pattern throughout the fifty-odd minutes -- I think McMillan won on points, but Vallely was rambling if insightful and I thought Bagshawe talked some real common sense all of the way through -- which considering my own liberalism is interesting -- perhaps she’s a moderate Tory (well she did join the Labour Party for a few months in 1996 according to her biog!).

The debate, though, was fairly well controlled. Only the panellists and us questioners were miked, so although people where shouting from the floor, they were warned throughout that they couldn’t be heard. You can hear the rentagob during the slavery question but that’s not the only time he shouted out and there were some other professional hecklers but none of them really made too much of an impact other then to interrupt the flow of discussion. Oborne was being deliberately controversial and was largely treated with contempt as he entered preach mode here and there -- he seemed to be allowed to ramble on far longer then the other speakers because Dimbleby and his producer were having a small discussion while he was speaking. I’ll be interested to hear how it came across when I listen again tomorrow.

I'm glad that the discussion touched on the capital of culture which has become a rather larger issue in the local press as hints and allegations are tossed around and people are asked to resign and don't. Obviously it was given a more wider national feel with Oborne trying to win the crowd back and Bagshawe looking cute whilst mentioning The Beatles because someone had to mention The Beatles, there's a rule. McMillan is right though -- it is the perfect opportunity to help bring communities together and it would be a shame to squander it.

The show ended abruptly as the names of next week’s panel were read out. After the return to broadcasting house, Jon thanked us again for coming, apologised for not everyone being able to be heard and thanked the panel, deliberately screwing up Oborne’s name as revenge for his bloopers during the show. He directed us to listen to Any Answers? and then that was that.