"Though it may seem obvious that a drunk person should be allowed to be taxied home by a fully autonomous car, the question is less clear if you have to determine just how autonomous an autonomous vehicle needs to be for a drunk person to operate it. The government should want drunk people to engage a high-level autonomous driving system if the alternative is driving themselves home, but if they’ll be penalized for being drunk while they’re “in control” of an autonomous vehicle, uptake of self-driving systems may be slow."The answer within the article suggests that a felony is only committed when a drunk person manually takes the wheel of the automated car and therefore driving it. But as someone who doesn't trust technology to break down, because technology always breaks down, I think that it's imperative that law doesn't change on drink driving whether someone is in an autocar or not.
I'd argue that someone who's been drinking still shouldn't be allowed anywhere near the vehicle in case it malfunctions in a dangerous situation and they're forced to take control. I'd be afraid to let someone without a driving license, like me, to have an automated car or be able to travel in an automated car for this reason. The idea of driverless taxis also scare the bejesus out of me.
No comments:
Post a Comment