"The idents will be revealed on BBC One after Strictly Come Dancing on 2 December and will appear across the channel throughout the festive season."
Christmas Links #2
"The idents will be revealed on BBC One after Strictly Come Dancing on 2 December and will appear across the channel throughout the festive season."
Together in Eclectic Dreams (Classic Doctors, New Monsters: The Stuff of Nightmares)
Audio Disclosure: when I listened to If I Should Die Before I Wake from the Classic Doctors, New Monsters: The Stuff of Nightmares boxset it was in isolation, what I mean is, I went straight to the story which had the Eighth Doctor's face on it and ignored the rest on the expectation that I'd come back to them after I'd caught up on everything else. Then Summer came, then Autumn and with modern content consumption options which resemble the Temporal Loom exploding in Disney+'s Marvel's Loki (TM), completely forgot about it. Until last night when I decided to do an audit of the Eighth Doctor material still to be covered and noticed he was listed as appearing in this Sixth Doctor story. So, here we are.
Roy Gill's Together in Eclectic Dreams brings the return of the Dream Crabs from TV's Last Christmas. The Sixth Doctor's companion Mari is experiencing nightmares, so he takes her to a monastery in the Archipelago of High Dream in the hopes they'll be able to offer some therapy. During her first sleep observation session she finds herself inside another TARDIS and another Doctor who we know is the Eighth Doctor, sounding cantankerous and desperate because he's already well aware that he's lost in a dream and doesn't know which way to go, with Mari finally offering a lifeline. As the story progresses, the characters find themselves slipping between various states of Inceptionesque slumber.
This is still the Sixth Doctor's story with the Eighth Doctor very much a supporting player. But is he real or just part of the collective unconsciousness of the characters? Sam the dream expert suggests that this "green man" changes faces and in his mental travels he's seen what sounds like the Twelfth and Thirteenth Doctors too, but I think it is supposed to be Eighth, perhaps from when he's also caught up in the crab's claws in the following story If I Should Die Before I Wake. There's a wonderful moment when their two minds contact and we're treated to the poetry of their collective history including a "terrible" great-aunt who lived in a draughty house high in the Gallifreyan mountains who would nevertheless sing him lullabies.
Last Christmas offered up what the "boards" univerally acknowledged as one of the best companions we never got in the shape of Faye Marsay's Shona and her eclectic film collection. Coincidentally, Big Finish have achieved the same with Mari, who between Gill's script and Susan Hingley's performance manages to create a figure as richly drawn as any of the official companions, funny and clever and who you simply enjoy spending time with and wanting to hear more from. The point was obviously to create the perfect plus one so Sixth would feel the loss when she's not there. In my head canon, the moment after the story ends is when he hear's Charley's distress call at the beginning of The Condemned, explaining why he's so open to having this stranger on board in the ensuring episodes.
Placement: Assuming this is a real Eighth Doctor, I'll put it in front of the next story in the boxset.
Christmas Links #1
Till Death Us Do Part (The Paternoster Gang: Rogue's Gallery)
Audio Ah The Paternoster Gang. At least once a year, Big Finish have the Eighth Doctor wander into one of their spin-off series and finally, he's turned up in Victorian England and bumped into Vastra, Jenny and Strax. With only a finite amount of money at my disposal, I avoided the previous series, only really dipping my toe in via The Eighth of March box, Once and Future and the crossover with Jago & Lightfoot. Steven Moffat apparently pitched this spin-off when he was showrunner, with the opening half of The Crimson Horror looking for all the world like a backdoor pilot. He was knocked back but at least thanks to our audio BF we can have some idea of what such a thing would be like.
It's fun. Having not heard the opening box, I don't know how much this replicates the formula, but it's very much the s7/Torchwood/SJA model of an alien of the week in a Holmisan period setting usually being exploited by some local hoodlum with the gang investigating then breaking the case wide open. The characters are the draw, the naughty interplay between Vastra and Jenny whose relationship can be explored in greater detail and the sheer brilliance of Strax, played with such determination by Dan Starkey (who also writes the second story in the series) and probably offers the most laughs across these three episodes.
Till Death Us Do Part
Vastra and Jenny are finally having a wedding but the planning and ceremony are interrupted by a series of curious events with duplicates of themselves and others, creating havoc. There is a general sense of unease throughout as characters sound almost but not exactly like themselves and the Eighth Doctor appears all over the place but not apparently in a linear order and out of sorts. DWM's reviewer attributes this to Paul, suggesting he sounds "distracted and possibly even a little bit confused by it all" but it's obviously because the character himself is supposed to be: he's forgetful, skittish and one minute knows who Jenny is and the next has no idea.
Placement: Like The Truth of Peladon, he's wearing his Dark Eyes leathers on the cover even though there isn't really a gap for him to be travelling along, so I'll put it next to that for now unless something else crops up.
Charlotte Pollard: The Further Adventuress.
Audacity.
Audio Ha, OK. Even before listening to this, I had the opening paragraph of a review in my head, about how this was yet another bold new era for the Doctor, presumably somewhere around the DWM comic strips judging by the costume on the cover perhaps set right at the start of the Big Finish audios before Shada, even. Then spoiler happens and I'm of the opinion that Big Finish are just fucking with me personally. So the "placement" section at the bottom of this will probably be longer than usual, but it might be worth staying away until you've had a chance to hear this.
Even without the costume, you can somehow tell this is a much earlier Eighth than the Lucie, Dark Eyes era (for want of a better description) and the Time War. Having shaken off the events of both the novels and comics (in my headcanon), he's the slightly tigerish, adventurous figure who doesn't yet have the weight of the multiple deaths and estrangement that he experiences in the audio years on his shoulders and still very willing to collect passengers, especially, as Audacity is here, in dire need of saving. It just shows you what an asset McGann is that he can recreate all of these subtly different versions of the character.
Of course, he's intrigued by Lady Audacity Montague, of course he is. Apart from her gung-ho, fearless, feminist attitude, she's from a period before technology which means he's able to impress her with future technology and other kinds of spectacles, to impress her, as she calls him on early in their second episode together. She's in the lineage of companions that includes River, Lady Christina, Trix and Fey, the kind who can get along perfectly well without him but take a shine to the Time Lord and his magic box for whatever reason and find a mutual understanding, if not love.
The Devouring
Follows the Rose/Storm Warning playbook of introducing the companion first and whatever madness has been let loose with the Doctor's gradual introduction. The Devouring, an alien species obsessing over another being who happened to look in their direction is perhaps a metaphor for stalkers and how they can consume a person's whole life. Writer Lisa McMullin has RTD's facility for sketching in but making meaningful side characters which means the scenes in the foe consumers everyone Audicity's been in contact with are even more horrible.
The Great Cyber-War
Good, bold title as the Doctor finally visits a period which has been hinted at throughout the franchise, notably TV's Revenge of the Cybermen apparently at random (although we know it is really the TARDIS taking him where he needs to be). Now we have an explanation for why gold of all things was so damaging to Cybermen, why they sounded so emotional in the 80s episodes despite saying that they'd drained themselves of emotion and how Voga ended up orbiting Jupiter. It's all about as convincing as these grace notes usually are and it won't be the last time the Doctor finds himself making history.
Writer Tim Foley doesn't shortchange the action either, this is a six-episode (in old money), multi-location, cast of dozens epic with rich characterisation across the board, which also knows that all most of us really want or need from a Cyberman story is for one of the metal monsters to clench his biker-gloved fist and say "Excellent" with a mid-Atlantic accent as though they have bucket on their head and for the Doctor to shout "It's a cyber mat!" when required. It's all good, clean tremendous, straightforward fun I'm glad we're hearing more of it in these releases.
Placement: Ha, well. As I said in the introduction, I was all ready to drop this before Shada, but then Charley appears at the end in Tibet, the Doctor having dropped her there for a bit, much as he did with Sam at Greenpeace and my brain turned to soup and began pouring out of my ears. Assuming this is chronological, Charley sounds more mature than in her first season so I'm assuming this is supposed to be somewhere close to the start of the second season unless more information comes to light, like all of this is actually set after The Girl Who Never Was or the Doctor's jumped back into his own past and selfishly picked up Charley before an earlier version of himself was supposed to.
Doctor Who Children in Need Special 2023.
Cinematic Shakespeare.
Film Recently, in the lead-up to the 400th anniversary of the publication of the First Folio, the BBC has broadcast a series of archive Shakespeare productions including a Hamlet double bill on one Sunday night, which would have tested the metal of even his biggest fan (and I speak as someone who once listened to three full-text audio versions in a day).
* * * * *
Of all the plays you would think might be the first to survive on film, it wouldn't be King John. But there he is, actor-manager Herbert Beerbohm Tree playing the doomed monarch in poisonous, fearful death, silently intoning Shakespeare's words back in 1899. The Folger Shakespeare Library has a lengthy article about this which explains that it was shot on stage at the Palace Theatre on September 20th, the same night Tree's own stage production began its sun at Her Majesty's Theatre.
Shakespeare has flourished in film since with hundreds of productions across most of the rest of the canon. What we're concerning ourselves with here are those which as projects were originated and shot on film (so no direct stage transfers) or HD in a so-called "classical Hollywood" style with all the visual tricks that entail. The text could be cut or rearranged, but the words coming out of the actor's mouths are Shakespeare's.
Here is my curated list in First Folio order. As you'll see I've tried to pay respect to both theatrical and cinematic history (Ken, Larry, Orson etc). It's also fair to say that some of the choices are by default because they're the only version of the play to fit the criteria. We still await the retro-noir version of Measure for Measure I've had in my head for decades (and just turning the colour off on the BBC 1994 Performance version isn't quite the same). Anyway, I hope you enjoy it.
THE COMEDIES
Propero's Books (1991) After numerous attempts with various directors, John Gielgud finally played the title character of The Tempest in Peter Greenaway's eclectic, avant-garde visually stunning treatment. Greenaway plays with the notion of Prospero as Shakespeare's avatar and the popular belief that in writing the text and the sorcerer's words he was bidding farewell to his life's work. If you are treating this as the opening film of a festival, it's a great introduction.
Two Gentlemen of Verona There have been no cinematic versions.
The Merry Wives of Windsor There have (mostly) been no cinematic versions. See Chimes at Midnight.
Measure for Measure There have been no cinematic versions.
The Comedy of Errors There have been no cinematic versions.
Much Ado About Nothing (1991) There's not much of a contest here, this has Ken and Em at their zenith shot beneath the golden Tuscan sky in a rendering of the play which makes sense of the comedic scenes as well as the tragic. More than most of Branagh's films, this has him clashing Hollywood and UK theatrical royalty together, with Denzel meeting Briersley and BRIAN BLESSED and Ben Elton playing sidekick to Michael Keaton. Also the first major screen role for Kate Beckinsale.
Love's Labour's Lost (2000) Ken's version of this prequel to a lost play drew criticism from some for cutting almost three-quarters of the play and turning the whole thing into a 1930s musical (especially with this being the only film version of the play available) but the result is so adorable I'll forgive everything. The cuts are also immensely clever. In its complete form, LLL can be difficult to follow in places, but through production design and costume, everything here is perfectly clear.
A Midsummer Night's Dream (1999) The apogee of the 90s Shakespeare film cycle, this Branagh-influenced version returns to a Tuscan setting (still referred to as Greece in the text) and has John Sessions as Philostrate. The magic of the forest is given the full special effects treatment and the whole of the cast is just so gosh-darn adorable, with Michelle Pfeiffer at her imperious best as Titannia and Kevin Kline offering his thoroughly cute Bottom.
The Merchant of Venice (2004) The casting of the Sicilian Italian-American Al Pacino as Shylock looks pretty dated in retrospect, but Michael Radford's production does at least notice that this isn't a particularly funny play, cutting most of the box-checking scenes and highlighting the animosity between the ethnic and religious groups in Venice. It's also notable for its location shooting in Venice and doesn't downplay the homo-erotic aspects of some relationships.
As You Like It (2006) Back to Branagh for his final Shakespeare production on film (so far) which transposes the play to a late 19th-century European colony in Japan after the Meiji Restoration amongst the English traders who were fascinated by the local culture. Future Doctor Who Romola Garai plays Celia, with most of his usual repertory appearing and Kevin Kline joining as Jaques. Theatrically released in the UK, it was produced for HBO back when they did this sort of thing.
The Taming of the Shrew (1967) Taylor and Burton bouncing off the walls of Cineceta and each other. Unlike her husband, Liz hadn't acted Shakespeare before and after much persistence, she was able to lobby director Franco Zeffrelli to redo the first week's shooting at the end once she'd got the hang of the iambic pentameter. Cuts include the induction with Christopher Sly and most of the Lucentio and Bianca subplot. Michael Hordern is delightful as Kate's father
All's Well That Ends Well There have been no cinematic versions.
Twelfth Night (1996) Considering its popularity, it's surprising that Adrian Noble's country house take is the only version of the play on film. It's perfectly fine with a strong cast led by Imogen Stubbs and Helena Bonham Carter with Ben Kingsley as Feste, REG as Aguecheek, Mel Smith as Toby Belch and Nigel Hawthorne as Malvolio. Once again it feels of a piece with Ken's style but he'd already produced a TV version for Channel 4 in 1988 with Briesley in the yellow britches.
The Winter's Tale There have been no cinematic versions (in 1968, Frank Dunlop adapted his Edinburgh Festival stage production but even that isn't available).
THE HISTORIES
King John There have been no cinematic versions (apart from the 1899 version which wouldn't count anyway).
The Hollow Crown (2012-2016) For the tetralogies, you've two choices. The Hollow Crown allows you to follow the whole damn story with shared casts, all of the best actors of the period reading Shakespeare's words in a style which is essentially Game of Thrones without the dragons, with Henry VI is heavily cut and runs across two episodes. Or you can treat some of the plays individually and take a more eclectic approach. See below:
Richard II There have been no other cinematic versions.
Chimes at Midnight (1966) Out of circulation until recently due to licensing issues, Orson Welles's labour of love essentially pulls all of the Falstaff scenes from the various plays including The Merry Wives of Windsor and spins them into a relatively coherent screenplay. The director makes for a rambunctious lead character and the eclectic cast includes Gielgud and Jeane Moreau as Doll Tearsheet.
Henry V (1944) To ease us out of the Welles, it's back to one of the grandparents of Shakespeare on film. Opening in a recreation of an Elizabethan theatre to underscore the artifice of what's ahead, like a backstage musical the stage becomes a near-infinite space across which the battle of Agincourt and everything else in Larry's interpretation takes place. Sacred enough that when Ken wanted to make his version, the effort was branded as precocious.
Richard III (1955) Olivier played Richard on stage, but his film version is a different entity with a new cast and production design. Apparently, it wasn't well received by critics at the time but the opening monologue has become iconic and it's said many actors work hard not to play it like Olivier (Ken parodies this during the audition scene of In The Bleak Midwinter). The late, lamented Network released a wonderfully crisp restoration of this which is worth tracking down.
Henry VIII (1979) Director Kevin Billington, in an effort to shift the play away from its usual presentation as a pageant, shot this on location at Leeds Castle, Penshurst Place and Hever Castle, often in the rooms where the historical action is presumed to take place. As a result, it looks more "cinematic" than a lot of the films on this list not least because everyone looks absolutely freezing, their breath steaming throughout. The DVD transfer is pin-sharp.
THE TRAGEDIES
Troilus and Cressida (1981) There have been no cinematic versions.
Coriolanus (2011) In this modern dress adaptation, director Ralph Feinnes transfers ancient Rome to the Balkans during a pseudo-Yugoslave war, with the actual Jon Snow offering backstory at the beginning in the style of a newscast. Rattles through a cut text in a couple of hours, Fiennes cuts a commanding, bloodthirsty figure as the title character, nevertheless crumbling in the face of Vanessa Redgrave's Volumnia. Mother knows best.
Titus (1999) Like Coriolanus, Julie Taymor's film refuses to accept the play's original setting, instead clashing together designs from various periods of history, from ancient Rome to Mussolini's Italy through the eyes of the contemporary small boy introduced at the beginning who enters the production as young Lucius is really just messing about with toy soldiers. Which doesn't make it any less gruesome, Tony Hopkins serving revenge with Lectorish glee.
William Shakespeare's Romeo + Juliet (1996) Could it be anything other than Baz Luhrmann? Few productions have convincingly suggested these two could fall in love overnight, but when Leo and Claire furtively gaze at one another through the fish tank you're sold. Also manages to make you forget this is a play you've seen a dozen times before, with the various contrivances absolutely heart-sucking. One for the ages.
Timon of Athens (1981) There have been no cinematic versions.
Julius Caesar (1953) Developed in reaction to Olivier's Henry V, this full-tilt classical Hollywood production re-uses sets from Quo Vadis and was shot in black and white so as not to draw comparison and to suggest contemporary film reels reflecting the still evident fascist movements in Europe. Features James Mason and Gielgud as Brutus and Cassius, Marlon Brando as Mark Anthony and a host of recognisable character actors from that period.
Macbeth (1948) Orson Welles: "I thought I was making what might be a good film, and what, if the 23-day shoot schedule came off, might encourage other filmmakers to tackle difficult subjects at greater speed. Unfortunately, not one critic in any part of the world chose to compliment me on the speed. They thought it was a scandal that it should only take 23 days. Of course, they were right, but I could not write to every one of them and explain that no one would give me any money for a further day's shooting . . . However, I am not ashamed of the limitations of the picture."
Hamlet (1996) Branagh's magnum opus, a four-hour production of a conflated text collecting as much Hamlet as Shakespeare wrote, including some odds and sods from Q1. As with 99% of productions, Ken and his cohorts are too old for their parts (is everyone in court a mature student?) but this is Shakespeare rendered in 70mm with more stars than a Record Breakers Christmas Special. Briersley's spymaster Polonius steals the show.
King Lear (1970) Pitch dark Bergmanesque production from Peter Brook with Paul Schofield's Lear against a blasted wilderness, shot in the wintery dune country of Denmark's Jutland Peninsula. Visually it's absolutely extraordinary, the grain of the 16mm creating the impression that we're watching action filmed in a documentary style in the deep past. Probably in my top three favourite Lears, along with Kurosawa's Ran and the RSC production with Romola Garai amongst others.
Othello (1995) Although there had been earlier indie productions starring Ted Lange and Yaphet Kotto, this was the first mainstream production to feature a black actor in the lead role, the fantastic Laurence Fishburne. It's adapted and directed by Oliver Parker and Ken only plays Iago, but manages to feature some of his usual ensembles, Michael Maloney and Nicholas Farrell. Shot on location in Venice and Cyprus, David Johnson's cinematography gives it an erotic thriller feel.
Antony and Cleopatra (1972) Having yet to have the chance to see this, here's a take from the BFI's old ScreenOnline website: "Emphasising spectacle at the expense of subtlety (even to the point of recycling shots from the 1959 Ben-Hur, in which Heston had starred some thirteen years earlier!), this adaptation shows little feeling for the emotions at the core of the story, and is torpedoed by the lack of chemistry between Heston and South African actress Hildegard Neil, who is arguably miscast as Cleopatra."
Cymbeline There have been no cinematic versions.
13 British Library
Books A couple of weeks ago I had the privilege of being in the audience for a live recording of Greg Jenner's Radio 4 podcast You're Dead To Me at the Shakespeare North Playhouse in Prescot. Not having listened before I didn't really know what to expect and it was mostly a chance to see the new theatre without the distraction of having to watch a play and acting. The guests were Professor Farah Karim-Cooper, Professor of Shakespeare Studies at King’s College London and Co-Director of Education & Research at Shakespeare’s Globe, and the comedian Richard Herring.
The podcast, which you can listen to here, offered the bare bones of Shakespeare's biography and some of the publishing history of the First Folio and there wasn't much about either that didn't already know. But I did find out that Richard Herring only has one testicle, which was funny when he mentioned it on stage but is of course very serious because his other ball was removed because of testicular cancer, which he talked about in an interview around this time last year which is posted on his website. Richard also talks about the podcast on his blog and some of the retakes that were needed to make it clean for radio broadcast.
After the show, a queue quickly built up towards the theatre's exhibition area because on tour and on display is the Grenville First Folio. Usually on display in the British Library, where I originally saw it back in 2016, I'd completely forgotten it was going to be in Prescot (my memory is terrible these days). So after a pretty decent coffee in the on-site cafe and a visit to the shop to let the crowds dissipate, I wandered down into the now nearly empty display space to have another look. It's pretty sparse, mostly information boards offering some background and an introductory video projected on the wall.
It's commonly called the Grenville Folio because the long-time Member of Parliament and First Lord of the Admiralty Thomas Grenville bequeathed it to the library on his death. Still, he wasn't the first known owner of the volume. As Eric Rasmussen's The Shakespeare First Folios: A Descriptive Catalogue describes, that would be Dr John Monroe a physician at Bethlehem Hospital who sold it to James Midgely, Jr at a Sotheby's sale for £13 13s who then sold it in 1818 to Grenville via a bookseller for what was then the record price of 116 guineas, around £10,000 in today's money.
The Folio was amongst 20,000 books that were passed to the British Library almost all of which had been rebound by Grenville as they entered his collection much to the annoyance of later scholars who wonder what information they might have gleaned from the discarded pieces. Presented on a transparent display lectern, the binding which Rasmussen describes as "sumptuous full goatskin stamped with a coat of arms" does stand out from some of the more sombre bindings I've seen but also doesn't quite fit the pages it contains.
As is customary in these kinds of displays, there isn't much to see, it's about being the presence of the book. Just as it is in the British Library, it's open on the frontispiece and the Droeshout engraving of Shakespeare's portrait with Ben Jonson's To The Reader opposite which ironically means that none of the playwright's own words are being shown. Neither is the note with Grenville left on the first leaf which says "This first edition of Shakespeare is an original and perfect copy, and was purchased by me in it’s first binding & in it’s original state. T.G.". Grenville wanted to leave no doubt about his ownership.
Further sightings:
This copy has appeared on television back in 2009 as part of From Page To Screen: Hamlet, a BBC Learning Zone schools programme about the making of the RSC production starring David Tennant. It's very easy to identify thanks to the distinctive binding also it also helped that there are also shots of a Q1 copy with the British Museum stamp on them and I assumed the crew filming b-roll would have gathered all of this coverage on the same day.
They appear in a sequence in which the play's director Gregory Doran is explaining the different versions of the play and how the production used Q1's alternative structure, notably the placement of the To Be Or Not To Be speech (see my review).
Tales of the TARDIS.
Once and Future: The Union
Audio During the fiftieth anniversary, the lead character in Doctor Who had a convenient number of incarnations for releasing a celebratory story a month. Across IDW Comics, Puffin and BBC Audio/Big Finish that's exactly what happened with each version of the Doctor celebrated across the first eleven with the twelfth slot given over to some kind overall story resolution were necessary. August was a big month for us Eighth Doctor completists, even if the audio, Enemy Aliens, was the only decent attempt of the three.
Since then the numbers have become a bit complicated and so licensees have gone for more of a general celebratory approach with Titan Comics largely keeping to participating in the Doom's Day crossover and a Tenth Doctor graphic novel by Dan Slott, BBC Children's Book rolling out three short hard covers featuring revival incarnation in stories set across the past three decades and Big Finish offering this seven parts and a coda, Once and Future.
Multi-Doctor stories are fine and Big Finish has produced some immensely entertaining versions over the years, but they're also aware of the stove hattedness of them so instead have gone for stories which feature a lot of different versions of the Doctor mostly not directly interacting with themselves. At some point during the Time War, the Time Lord has been hit by a "degeneration" weapon which causes a shift backwards and forwards between different faces. Who did this and how can it be stopped?
It's been a fun journey. Some stories have worked better than others, shifting tonally wildly between average romp and curate's egg but it's mostly just been a good excuse to bring together combinations of Doctor, companions and antagonists which might not otherwise meet. As "degeneration" suggests, this is some future version of the Doctor who happens to sounds like the 4th or 10th Doctor during that adventure with only the memories necessary for the plot. So we see what happens when Sixth runs into Lady Christina and Jackie Tyler, that sort of thing.
Once and Future: The Union
Its with some trepidation I visited The Union because one of the key mysteries running through the series was in which incarnation the Doctor was originally zapped. Depending on when it happened, I was either going to have to review the whole lot for the chronology or a few paragraphs to fit in the "Almost, but not quite, entirely unlike the Eighth Doctor ..." section at the bottom and not having to worry about whether the third Doctor suddenly knows who Charley Pollard is.
Big Finish themselves rather gave the game away with their news page on the release with the line, "But which Doctor was shot with it? Was it the War Doctor? The Eighth Doctor? The Fourth?" Given that the War Doctor isn't on the box art, it's clearly something they wanted to keep secret up until recently so it was clearly going to be him. Big Finish may love stories but sometimes they're not big on surprises (which is why you should also ignore the cast list for this one until after you've listened to the end).
What we have here is the old "Trill" theory of the Doctor writ large, that there's a core being that calls itself the Doctor which is then hosted by the various incarnations and personalities like a biological desktop theme. When there's a regeneration that host dies and another emerges who like the Trill in Star Trek is a new individual that is connected to the metaphysical creature whatever and wherever that is, a creature which sometimes communicates with the out shell more directly by choosing a particular face.
In The Union, the Eighth version of the Doctor effectively becomes the spokesperson for the other faces. He's the one who gets to do the big speeches about how no matter what they look like the core elements of what make the Doctor remain, that he is a good man. You can tell McGann loves this mythologizing of Doctor Who. Quite rightly he's inarguably become a relevant and vital part of the franchise despite a shaky beginning in 1996 and being the connoisseur's choice in successive years.
There are some surprises especially in the b-plot which offers some squinty homages to a numerous elements from the history of the franchise. But this is mostly about explaining mysteries set up earlier in the overall story mostly, it has to be said due to the interventions of River Song who due to the Doctor's condition is more of an active participant, which as you know is fine by me especially hearing this blazing invocation of the revived series interacting with Susan, the one who started it all.
Elsewhere, The Union is a marvellous creation and Maureen O'Brien's performance really sells the batshit insanity locked within her character. There's also a lovely moment when this version of the Eighth Doctor and Susan finally make amends over the events in To The Death (Cass was recorded at least two years after this) and other cameos have similar notes but they're for other completists to cover (although its implied that no one will remember any of this anyway but they're nice sentiments).
Placement: "Almost, but not quite, entirely unlike the Eighth Doctor ..." unless something unusual happens in Coda and I have to rethink all of this again.
Even Richard Curtis Thinks Love Actually Is Rubbish
Film Hello. I know that apart from the all too obviously auto-posting BBC Mondays I haven't been around here much, but with Doctor Who's anniversary cranking up, the Sugababes glow-up, the Empire Magazine project which I've been writing about on BlueSky (@feelinglistless.bsky.social) having abandoned Twixxer and having finally reached 100% on Star Wars Lego: The Skywalker Saga, I expect there'll be the odd thing. Not that I'm making any kind of promises; I shall not be entering the existential void of every post being about how I should post more.
But I couldn't not return for the news made pretty obvious from the headline to this post. Richard Curtis thinks Love Actually is rubbish as well now. It's even made the cover of the Daily Star:
It's been reported in a lot of places, but let's link the Chortle version which is where I first heard the news. Curtis was at the Cheltenham Literary Festival being interviewed on stage by his daughter Charlotte, how put to him many of the points I made in the sixth most popular post on this blog about the treatment of women, particularly the "multiple accounts of inappropriate boss behaviour [...] and how in the general the women are visions of unattainable loveliness".
The writer who should never have been his own directors said:
- "I think I was unobservant and not as clever as I should have been."
- On diversity: "I think because I came from a very undiverse school and bunch of university friends, I think that I hung on to the feeling that I wouldn’t know how to write those parts. I think I was just stupid and wrong about that. I felt as though me, my casting director, my producers just didn’t look outwards."
- On fatphobia: "I remember how shocked I was five years ago when Scarlett said to me, "You can never use the word fat again". And, wow, you were right. In my generation, calling someone "chubby" ... in Love, Actually, there are endless jokes about that. I think I was behind the curve and those jokes aren’t any longer funny."
They weren't funny then, especially because you were describing the character played by Martine McCutcheon and how that reflects back on younger viewers who may be struggling with their own body image. The only reason I didn't mention that in my dissertation is because I was making a comparison with the treatment of gender and race in two other films, Happy Ending and Short Cuts.
Of course, Love Actually is over twenty years old now and edging ever closer to "vintage" and "of its time" labelling. There are humans walking around on this planet who're in their twenties who were born after it was originally released. It was released the same year Russell T Davies was commissioned to write and producer the Doctor Who revival.
Does this mean I'm willing to relax a little, perhaps admit that it isn't the worst film of all time? No, not a bit because that would require me to choose a different film and although About Time, The Boat That Rocked (or Pirate Radio if you're outside the UK) and Yesterday are waiting in the wings, I'm too vintage myself now to go through that mental hardship.
When the Rain Comes.
Music Hello. Listen to that! Just listen to it! Twenty-three years on from the release of One Touch, ten years since the release of anything by this line-up and here they are with more new music released near the time of its recording and it's amazing.
Their voices have matured and deepened but that harmony which slowly ebbed away with each line-up change across the ensuing decade is back and just as glorious and unique as ever. Not to mention it sounds like a Sugababes song that meld of pop and R'n'B which other bands attempted but couldn't recreate the alchemy. This sound is steadfast.
But so are the people. In 2009, Sioghan gave a semi-notorious interview in which she talked about her time with the Sugababes in less than glorious terms. I'm putting this here to just to demonstrate just how broken everything was in the late-00s:
Was it your decision to leave?
SD: Hell, yes. Though there was no doubt that I was pushed out. It was clear that there was someone in that band who never wanted me in it and that’s Keisha. She never wanted me in that band and made my life a living hell. It’s funny... all these years on, I’ve grown up and I’ve left it all behind me and I’m not bothered by it. I think a lot of the memories, I have just blocked out because I don’t really like to think of the nasty stuff. I like to think about the good things in life, always focus on the positive, and Zen and all that shit. But I’ll never forgive her. Though no-one forgives that first bully in their lives, do they? No-one does. Even when you’re fifty. Though, on the other hand, it doesn’t matter. You meet so many people in the world. Why would I need to reconcile with that person? I don’t even know if she would want to.Well, Siobhan did forgive her and as she's since said, it was a situation in which they were all manipulated by their management and whoever. Perhaps Keisha saw this and reached out? Nevertheless, they're back it is indeed about time and again in a Doctor Who anniversary year. Let me put it this way. If Flatline was the TV Movie, this song and apparent album are the 2005 revival. Hopefully they won't regenerate this time.
What about Breakfast At Tiffany's?
Film Tonight I had the privilege of watching the version of Breakfast at Tiffany's broadcast on Boxing Day last year on Channel 5 at 9:05 in the morning. Yes, 5 broadcast a PG rated romance between a call girl and gigolo at breakfast time with these sponsorship buffers no less:
But what was interesting about this broadcast was that Channel 5 took the decision to remove all the scenes featuring Mickey Rooney's yellow faced turn as Holly's neighbour Yunioshi. As expected, the usual people were quite cross about this. Apologies for this Daily Mail link.
In the thorough retelling of the making of the film, "Fifth Avenue, 5 A.M.: Audrey Hepburn, Breakfast at Tiffany's, and the Dawn of the Modern Woman", author Sam Wasson interviews the producers of the film who talk about how they pleased with director Blake Edwards to remove the scenes.
But they were in New York, he was in LA and the director who'd been friends with Rooney for years was adamant that they stay in, despite test screenings indicating that audiences found those scenes uncomfortable and didn't laugh at all.
The producers did get Edwards to shoot two versions of the one scene in which Holly and Yunioshi properly interact, one with Rooney, one without with a view to cutting him out completely from the finished film. He was not, which Edwards later regretted.
Rooney for his part said just before he died that he shouldn't have done it.
So what's Tiffany's like without the yellow face? Blissful and if you were showing this version of the film to someone as their first go around they would not have known that anything was missing. Whoever prepared this was immensely sympathetic.
Mostly the removals are achieved through dissolves as in the opening scenes when Yunioshi complains about Holly pushing his buzzer to let him in and she's followed by one of her clients from the evening. Instead of her placating him, it dissolves to Paul arriving in the taxi.
Of course, this does have the knock on effect of removing Holly's first proper appearance so the first chance we really get to see her is when Paul calls on her as he arrives in the building to use the telephone. He's much more of a viewpoint character into her world.
Yunoshi is still a ghostly presence. He's mentioned a few times, notably when he calls the police at the party. When Paul goes to answer the phone, we see him hear the ring, cut to eyepatch joke, then cut back to him putting the phone down. No information is lost.
In the drunk staircase scene, we cut directly from the moment Holly falls onto Paul's shoulders to her complaining about being interrupted and it simply looks like she means by herself rather than the cutaway to her upstairs neighbour from above. It works just as well.
Tiffany's has always been an uncomfortable watch for me because of these scenes. Much as I loved the film, and I do love the film, I've said before I would give anything to be Holly Golightly in those opening scenes, I haven't gone back to it because of them.
So what you lose from some of Holly's jokes, you gain from not having to deal with this racist stereotype stinking up the place, whose presence disrupting the tone of the film, outweighs actually how much screen time he has. Removing him matters not a jot.
Ethically, of course, all of this is quite dodgy. Few of the original creators are still around to sign off on it and if should never replace the theatrical cut, which is an artefact of its time and beloved by many as is.
But as an alternative version for those of us who're pulled out of the atmosphere of the story whenever Rooney's bucktooth caricature blunders through, it's dynamite.
And if this was how some kids were introduced to the film that Boxing Day morning, well fine.
Barbenheimer logistics.
Life Usually I'm not one to not avoid taking part in a collective meme, but having an excuse to see two films by a pair of our greatest filmmakers isn't something to not be embraced. Spending the day at the cinema was something I used to do a lot but as the cost of tickets rose, even for day showings, and the variety of films at multiplexes reduced, I got out of the habit. Having had too many bad audience and/or projection experiences, I just stopped going to the cinema except for spoiler-sensitive franchise features.
Lately, my cinemas of choice have been the Vue in Birkenhead, Picturehouse at FACT and the Cineworld in Speke. My calculation for where to see a film is usually based on screen size and price and although the largest screen at FACT is big enough, I've been travelling out to Cineworld when a new release has been relegated to the smaller screens, which also has the benefit of being pretty quiet during the day, especially in the morning. The downside is it's also pretty expensive even during the day, and I have free member tickets for the cinema on Wood Street.
For Barbenheimer, I immediately looked at the logistics for Cineworld and sure enough they were very good, especially for Monday - 10:30am for Barbie (10:50 after adverts) then a 13:15 for Oppenheimer (more like 13:30) - so plenty for time for a sandwich in the middle. But the price - £9.99 (during the day) still feels steep to someone who used to see three movies for that price at the Showcase on the East Lancs Road (admittedly when he used to have a student card). I'd have to nibble the fission bomb if I wanted to take part in a cultural moment (TM) which already has a thoroughly referenced Wikipedia page.
Then I took a step back, a longer look at the Cineworld website, did some sums and signed up for one of their Unlimited cards. £16.99 a month for a minimum of three months and as they say for the price of less than two tickets. I quicky booked for Monday and last Thursday to sneak in a showing of M:I Dead Reckoning Part One, something which would otherwise have waited until the BD or streaming upload which ever was the quickest. It is a film which should be seen on a big screen, although I don't know that it needs to be that long (unlike Oppenheimer).
Of course, £16.99 per month is incredible value if you plan to see everything which turns up at the multiplex in comparison to the price of a single ticket and much quicker than a home release which you won't see in nearly the quality of presentation (which has so far been excellent at this particular place). But unlike streaming services which charge a lot less than this, it has a much smaller selection of films available in a geographically less convenient place than a chair in the house in front of a screen (or as has been the case here for about six months a projection on a wall).
But what this means I have to take advantage of the offer, I need to visit the cinema more and so at least once a week for the foreseeable, I'll be travelling out to my original home of Speke to see one or two films (maybe three), which makes it a homecoming in numerous ways. Next week I have Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny pencilled in (which would be good to see before it disappears from cinemas) and perhaps the film about the actually teenaged mutant ninja turtles. Not everything will be good but it'll be fun not having to wait three months to see what everyone has been talking about.
18 Dulwich College Library
Literature Folio 400 is a series of events and exhibitions to mark the four hundredth anniversary of the first Folio of Shakespeare's play. The majority of the displays were on the weekend of his birthday and pretty difficult to get to from Liverpool in a day (even if I hadn't been working), but the book owned by the Dulwich College Library is on display at the National Maritime Museum in Greenwich until the 24th September and having already booked a day trip last Friday because the tickets were surprisingly cheap (£60 all in), I decided it was the ideal opportunity to cross an otherwise pretty inaccessible copy off the list.
The Folio's on show in the Maritime London section of the museum, an intimate exhibition space on the ground floor of an outer atrium which is otherwise spacious and on that day busy with school groups on the usual end of term visits making memories. As you can see from the photograph, there's the usual hushed lighting and contextual text which creates the impression that the visitor is seeing something extra-special. No matter how many of these items I've seen and even touched over the years, it's almost always with a sense of awe.
The Dulwich is also unusual because Eric Rasmussen says in his concordance The Shakespeare First Folio, "the fragmented copy exists in two bound volumes, Comedies and Histories". The comedies aren't even complete with only nine of the fourteen plays and six pages from Romeo and Juliet grafted on. If there was also a volume for the tragedies, it's become lost somewhere along the way, presumably before it became part of the library's collection. This is a rare occasion when its possible for a display to include two sets of pages from a Folio.
The accompanying text does a good job of summarising the provenance from the Rasmussen book, describing how Dulwich College was founded by 1619 by Edward Alleyn, the Elizabethan tragedian portrayed by Ben Affleck in Shakespeare in Love, son-in-law of Philip Henslowe, the owner of the Rose Theatre (Geoffrey Rush). This copy was owned by William Cartwright the son of a friend of Alleyn who seems to have bequeathed it to the library on his death in 1686. This is not a Folio which has travelled much., although the damage listed in Rasmussen indicates it has been well used.
One volume is open on the title page of The Tempest the other on Richard III, Act 1, Scene 4 in which Clarence dreams of falling from a ship bound for Burgundy witnessing the wrecks of other ships have gone before:
Methought I saw a thousand fearful wrecks;
Ten thousand men that fishes gnaw'd upon;
Wedges of gold, great anchors, heaps of pearl,
Inestimable stones, unvalued jewels,
All scatter'd in the bottom of the sea:
Some lay in dead men's skulls; and, in those holes
Where eyes did once inhabit, there were crept,
As 'twere in scorn of eyes, reflecting gems,
Which woo'd the slimy bottom of the deep,
And mock'd the dead bones that lay scatter'd by.
As the text label suggests, this captures "the contradictory attitudes of the time towards the sea - on the one hand they represent economic opportunity, on the other a vast, wild and dangerous space." Later in the scene he talks of "the tempest in my soul".



